Article: Plyometrics / Stretch Shortening Cycle

This is long but informative, in my opinion. The site the article is on is:

[quote]Plyometrics - A. Faccioni


Plyometrics is a popular training technique used by many coaches today. It has
been touted as a way to bridge the gap between sheer strength and power. The
term plyometrics can be used to describe any exercise that allows the athletes to
take advantage of the stretch-shortening cycle to produce an explosive movement…
Although plyometric training has been around for many years, there is still debate
on it effectiveness and safety. This literature review seeks to review all relevant
information on plyometric training so that its value can be assessed as a training

The Stretch Reflex

Knowledge of how the stretch reflex is used is essential to being able to understand
how plyometrics work. The stretch reflex causes the muscle to contract when it is
stretched and inhibits the antagonist muscle from contracting. It is this reflex
which causes the quadriceps muscle to contract when the patellar tendon is hit by a
rubber mallet. The hitting of the tendon causes the quadriceps to stretch which
results in activation of the sensory spindle receptors in the muscle. The spindle
receptors which lie in the body of the muscle are sensitive not only to the muscle
being stretched, but also the speed at which the muscle is stretched. The message
that the quadriceps is being lengthened is sent to the spinal cord via a one synaptic
junction which causes the motor horn cells in the spinal cord to act on this
information. In order to protect the muscle from being over stretched, the motor
horn cells react by contracting the muscle that is being stretched (quadriceps) and
the inhibiting the contraction of the antagonist (hamstring) muscle (Chu 1983).

Stretch-Shorten Cycle For Sport

The stretch reflex is utilized during many activities because most movements
involve two phases of muscular contraction. An eccentric phase which is the muscle
lengthening under tension is followed by a concentric phase in which the muscle is
shortened. Attaining a pre-stretch of the muscle causes it to be lengthened
eccentrically so tension is developed in the muscle like a rubber band. The tension
created in the muscle can be used to help increase the strength of the following
concentric contraction. The concentric contraction must take place immediately
after being stretched or the tension created dissipates as heat (Wilk 1993). An
example would be bending down before jumping which allows the quadriceps to be
stretched eccentrically so that the following concentric contraction will be stronger.
Taking advantage of the elasticity of the muscle and the stretch reflex is referred to
as using the stretch-shorten cycle (Bosco et al 1981). It has been shown that the
faster the muscle is stretched eccentrically, the greater the force will be on the
following concentric contraction (Bosco et al 1980).

History Of The Stretch-Shorten Cycle

During the 1960s, Professor Rodolfo Margaria of Milan was the first to identify the
value of the pre-stretch in producing a strong muscular contraction. Margaria’s
work looked at muscular movement as a whole. Based on this work, a length
tension diagram of the working muscle was developed. This allowed for the
comparison of the tension in a muscle that had been pre-stretched and one that
had not been pre-stretched. Margaria was able to show that the tension a muscle
was able to create was based not only on the muscle length, but also on the
previous activity of the muscle. Muscles were able to develop more tension if prestretched.
The amount of tension created by stretching the muscle was dependent
on the degree and the speed of the muscles’ pre-stretch. This research was used by
NASA to develop the most effective way to walk on the moon (Zanon 1989).

Stretch Reflex To Plyometrics

Margaria’s work was not only used by NASA, but also by Soviet researchers who
were assigned the task of improving the motor performances in athletes. In 1966.
V.M. Zaciorskiji used the work done by Margaria as the basis of promoting training
programs that involved using the stretch reflex. He referred to this type of training
as plyometric which is Greek. It comes from two words meaning greater, longer,
wider and to measure, to appraise, to compare. He used this term to describe the
greater tension that could be developed in muscles when a quick stretching phase is
followed by a fast contraction (Zannon 1989).

Soviet Development Of The Use of Plyometrics

In 1966 Yuri Verkhoshanski a Soviet jumping coach wrote about the importance of
finding a new way of bringing about sporting improvements. Previous training
methods that included a high volume of jumping exercises combined with weight
training were becoming less effective in bringing about improvements in athletes.
In looking at triple jumpers, Verkoshanski observed that those jumpers that spent
the least amount of ground contact time (amortisation phase) showed the greatest
jumping performance. He reasoned that optimal jumping performance needs
muscles to be strong eccentrically so that they can withstand the high mechanical
loading in the phase of amortisation. If muscles are strong eccentrically, they will
be able to quickly switch from overcoming the eccentric loading to immediately
contracting concentrically to accelerate the body in the required direction. This will
allow the athlete to take advantage of the tension in the muscle that is created
during the eccentric stretch. Thus improvements can be made in jumping
performance by increasing the amount of tension the athlete can generate during
the eccentric contraction and by improving the reactive ability of muscles in
switching from eccentric to concentric work (Verkhoshanski 1966).

Soviet Way Of Implementing Plyometrics

Verkhoshanski believed the jumping of athletes should be developed in three
stages. The first stage consists of general developmental strength and jumping
exercises. Lower leg exercises described by Dr. Gunter Fritzsche to develop leg
power in young athletes would be applicable for this stage (Jarver 1981). The
second stage should involve continued plyometric work with increased resistance
training to prepare the athlete for the increased muscle loading. The third stage
involves the athlete increasing the reactive ability of the neuromuscular system.
This would consist of using more stressful plyometric exercises that would help
facilitate an increase in reactive ability (Verkhoshanski 1966).

Depth Jumping

Verkhoshanski developed a plyometric exercise referred to as depth jumping. He
wanted an exercise that not only strengthened the muscle, but also developed the
reactive ability needed to decrease the amortisation phase. Verkhoshanski
explained that resistance training improves strength but slows down the reactive
ability of the muscle to switch from eccentric to concentric work during the
amortisation phase. To prevent this, he created depth jumping in which an athlete
jumps from a predetermined height and upon landing, quickly jumps upwards or
forward. This exercise not only demands dynamic strength to withstand the
landing, but also develops the reactive ability of muscle to switch from eccentric
work to concentric work (Verhoshanski 1966).

Performing Depth Jumps

In 1967 Verkhoshanski wrote an article detailing how depth jumps should be
employed in a training program. He stressed that their use should be in developing
the reactive ability and dynamic strength in athletes. He suggested that depth
jumps should be performed from a height of .75 to 1.15 metres. Depth jumps from
.75 metres height allows the athlete to develop his maximal reactive ability,
whereas jumping from 1.15 metres develops more dynamic strength in the athlete.
He stressed that using a height greater than 1.15 makes depth jumping ineffective.
The increased height changes the landing mechanism so neither dynamic strength
nor reactive ability is gained. The number of repetitions of depth jump to be
performed depends on the preparation and strength of the athlete. He recommends
for the prepared athlete, two depth jumping sessions a week, with a maximum of
40 repetitions per session(Verhoshanski 1967). Poole and Maneval (1987) also
found that two sessions per week were more effective than three sessions. Depth
jumps should be discontinued ten to fourteen days prior to competition. This is
because the after- effects of depth jumping last significantly longer than any other
type of strength exercises. Verkhoshanski recommended that the use of depth
jumping should be at the end of the strength development period or at the end of
the preparatory period of training (Verhoshanski 1967).

Introduction Of Plyometrics To The USA

Fred Wilt (1975) was the first to write about the use of plyometrics in the United
States. He introduced plyometrics as a training technique used by European
coaches to bridge the gap between sheer strength and speed. He went on to
suggest that the unexpected victory in the 100 and 200 metre sprints by Valery
Borozov was due in large part to his plyometric training routine. This article lead to
the wide spread use of plyometrics in the United States. It also lead to a heated
debate as to the effectiveness of plyometrics for improving athletic performance.

The Effectiveness of Depth Jumping

There have been several studies looking at the effectiveness at depth jumping in
developing lower leg power. These studies have brought about mixed results. The
study done by Verkhoshanski and Tatyan (1983) showed that athletes achieved a
significant difference in absolute, explosive, and starting muscle strength when they
trained using depth jumps. Athletes in the groups that used resistance training and
speed strength work did not achieve a significant difference in performance.
Blanttner and Noble (1979) compared depth jumping and isokinetic training to see
if either would have an effect on vertical jump. Both groups showed a significant
improvement in vertical jump but neither training method was shown to be more
effective than the other. Scoles (1978) found that depth jumping two times a
week from a height of .75 metres had no significant difference on his subjects’
standing long jump or vertical jump tests. Brown (et al 1986) found that depth
jumping resulted in a significant improvement in male high school basketball
players vertical jump. Poole and Maneval (1987) also found that a ten week
program of depth jumping significantly improved performance. A major limitation
of the above studies, except for Brown (et al 1987), was the athletic ability of the
subjects. Most of the subjects were either novices or had limited athletic ability.
Most of the studies seem to support that depth jumping does cause improvements.
Whether plyometrics is more effective than other forms of training for developing
power has not been proven. The wide variety of training designs makes it hard to
determine if plyometric training is more effective (Burr and Young 1989).

Safety of Plyometrics

The effectiveness of depth jumping has received much attention because of the
stress it places upon the athletes’ legs. Matt Brzycki, a strength coach for Rutgers
University has been one of the most outspoken critics of plyometric training. He
believes that exercises such as depth jumping put too much strain on the lower
body and lead to lower extremity injuries. He claims that there is no scientific proof
that plyometrics are more useful than other forms of training (Brzycki 1986). Pat
Evan MD. and team orthopedist for the Dallas Cowboys says that he sees more
medical problems caused from in depth jumping than from any other drill. Dr. Ken
Leistner concurs with this view and states “Plyometrics are dangerous in themselves
and will also do things to the body that will increase the probability of injuries
during future events.” Mike Gittleson, the strength and conditioning coach at the
University of Michigan, states that his athletes do not use plyometric exercises
because of the risk of injuries (Wikgren 1988). There are also numerous athletes
such as John Brenner, Lorna Boothe, and Merlene Ottey who blame depth jumping
for having a negative impact on their careers. Brenner, a bronze medalist shot
putter in the 1987 World Games, detached his quadriceps muscle performing a
depth jumps. Boothe and Ottey both blame depth jumping for giving them knee
pain (Horrigan and Shaw 1989)

Safe Use of Plyometrics

Peter Tegen, head track coach at the University of Wisconsin, believes that the
numerous injuries sustained by athletes in the West from plyometric training is a
result of too much too soon. He points out that in Eastern block countries, athletes
progress in stages, from small jumping exercises to depth jumps (Horrigan and
Shaw 1989). Kim Gross, the strength and conditioning coach for Air Force Academy
suggests that many of the injuries from plyometrics occur because athletes and
coaches underestimate their intensity. He states that it is important to closely
monitor the length and frequency of plyometric workouts. While injuries can occur
during plyometric training, there have been no epidemiological studies to suggest
that the injury rates associated with using plyometrics is great (Wathen 1993) In
fact, plyometrics can be used to prevent pre-season soreness. Borkowski (1990)
found that performing plyometrics with weight training helped to reduce the
preseason soreness in volleyball players.

American Coaches Views On Implementing Plyometrics

How to introduce plyometrics to athletes was a question that the National Strength
and Conditioning Association (NSCA) posed to American coaches, who were strong
advocates of using plyometrics. The general consensus among the coaches was
that plyometric training can be used with prepubescent and pubescent athletes as
long as they are performed with low volume and intensity. Jumps should be off of
both feet with no added stimulus of weighted vests or boxes. Gambetta suggests
ploymetric training should progress from simple to complex as the athlete matures.
This means going from bouncing movements, standing jumps, short jumps, and
then finally progressing to in depth jumps. He stresses that in depth jumping
should only be used if technique is sound and adequate strength levels are present.
Lundin, Bielik, and Rogers suggest that an athlete needs to be able to back squat
1.5 - 2 times their body weight before participating in advanced plyometric
exercises (Bielik et al 1986 A). The NSCA position statement on plyometrics also
agrees with this, stating that athletes should be able to back squat 1.5 -2.5 times
their body weight (Wathen 1993).

Lowering The Heights Of In Depth Jumps

Research indicates that the height of depth jumps can be lowered, thus reducing
the stress to the body if resistance training is used congruently with in depth
jumping. Clutch (et al 1983) also found that using three different jump training
methods while participating in a resistance weights program resulted in similar
improvements for all three groups’ vertical jumps. The variation in the three groups
training routines were as follows; group 1 used high depth jumps .75 to 1.10
metres, group 2 used low depth jumps .3 metres and group 3 used maximal vertical
jumps. Blakey and Southard (1987) attained the same results when they
conducted a similar experiment involving using different depth jump heights while
undergoing resistance training. Both of these studies indicate that the height of the
in depth jumps is not important when it is performed in a training cycle with
resistant weight training.

Plyometrics Combined With Resistance Training

The above studies by Clutch (et al 1983), Blakey and Southlard (1987), and Bauer
(1990) indicates that plyometric training is effective when combined with resistance
training. Studies were done by Verkhoshanski , (1983) and Adams (et al 1992)
that focused specifically on the effectiveness of plyometrics by themselves versus
using them simultaneously with a resistance program. They both concluded that
the best training results came when resistance training was combined with
plyometric work. Adams (et al 1992) suggests that this lends support to the idea
that plyometrics is a link between strength and power.

Plyometrics To Develop Power

Newton and Kraemer (1994) believe this link between power and plyometrics is
caused by the fact that power is based on five critical components. These
components are slow velocity strength, high velocity strength, rate of force
development, stretch shortening cycle, and inter-muscular coordination and skill.
Therefore, combining plyometrics with strength training is the most effective
method in maximizing power development, because it allows more components of
explosive power to be developed.

Practical Application OF Weights With Plyometrics

Radcliffe offers ideas on how resistance training and plyometrics should be used
together in training to develop all the components of power. He gives an example of
a resistance training session in which the athletes are not only lifting weights, but
are also doing plyometric work such as squat jumps and medicine ball drills in
between resistance training exercises (Radcliffe 1994). Lundin also does this, but
calls it parallel training. An example of this would be super setting back squats and
box jumps together. He states that the speed part of the training is not always true
plyometrics, but the objective is to achieve high velocity movements mixed in with
the resistance training work. When plyometric work of a specific nature is the aim,
Bielik, Lundin, Chu, and Rogers recommend that plyometrics be used before
resistance training. Gambetta believes that resistance training and plyometrics
should not be combined. He states that mixed training gives mixed results. All of
the experts from the NSCA round table discussion on plyometrics agree that
resistance training and plyometrics should be combined in some form, whether it is
the same session or on alternate days (Bielik et al 1986 b).

Upper Body Plyometrics

Most of the research on plyometrics has focused on the lower body. Interest is now
starting to increase on how upper body plyometrics can take advantage of the
stretch-shorten cycle in the same manner as lower body. The most common aid
used in performing upper body plyometrics is a medicine ball (Wilk 1993). A lot of
the early work done on upper body plyometrics is based on rehabilitation work used
on patients after shoulder reconstruction. The medicine ball activities of Chu
(1989) such as reverse toss, 90 degree side toss, and behind the back toss allow
the athlete to participate in advanced strengthening exercises that are not available
through the use of free weights.

Upper Body Plyometrics To Develop Power

These exercises are not only being used for rehabilitation, but are also being used
as a way to bridge the gap from traditional strength developed in the weight room
to power needed for different sports. Chu (1996) uses an excellent example to
illustrate the difference between weight room strength versus functional power. He
had two football players that could bench press four hundred pounds and an
Olympic javelin thrower who did not bench press. He had the athletes do a sitting
chest pass with a medicine ball. The javelin athlete threw the medicine ball 20 feet
further than the football players who were accustomed to performing that
movement. Obviously the football players where not as effective in converting their
strength into power. Using medicine ball drills, which Armstrong (1994) developed
that are specific for football, would help these players become more powerful.

General Training Principals When Using Plyometrics

A coach implementing a plyometrics program should keep some general training
principals in mind when organizing his program. The plyometric exercises should
be specific to the athletes’ sport. An upper body plyometric program would be more
sports specific for a football player than for a figure skater. The coach should give
feedback to the athlete as to how they are performing the exercises. It is important
that the athlete understand that ground contact time be as short as possible (Pryor
1994). The coach also needs to be able to evaluate the athletes’ performance and
make adjustments to training. An example would be if the athlete is spending too
much time on the ground, or their form is deteriorating, then the exercise should be
stopped (Bielik et al 1986 b).

How Plyometrics Should Be Implemented In A Training Program

Athletes should progress gradually from simple plyometric exercises to more
intense drills. The intensity and volume of the plyometric work should always be
comparable to the physiological abilities of the athlete. The emphasis on
plyometrics during the training should correspond to the goals of the training cycle.
Generally, the preparation phase involves low intensity exercises of longer duration.
This helps to give athlete a base as they move into more intense plyometric drills
such as depth jumping during the second half of the preparatory phase. During the
competition phase, the volume of plyometric exercises are reduced, but the athletes
continue to perform a low number of high intensity plyometric exercises. This
serves as a maintenance program to keep the strength that has been developed
(Bielik et al 1986 b).


This literature review has looked at the history, effectiveness and safety of
plyometrics. Plyometrics were first developed by Soviet coaches to take advantage
of the stretch-shorten cycle. It use was seen as a way to bridge the gap between
strength and power. There is still debate on whether plyometrics is more effective
in developing power than other forms of exercises. It has been shown that
excellent physical improvements can be made when plyometrics are combined with
resistance training Many critics of plyometrics suggest that injuries are caused
through its use but there have been no studies to confirm this view. To minimise
the chance of injury, it is important that coaches gradually allow their athletes to
progress from simple to advanced plyometric exercises. It is also important for
coaches to monitor that the athlete is using correct technique while performing
plyometric exercises. When plyometric exercises are administered properly in a
training program, they can be a valuable asset in the improvement of the athlete.


  1. Adams, K., O’Shea, K.L., and Climstein, M. 1992. The effect of six weeks
    of squat, plyometric and squat-plyometric training on power production. J.
    Appl. Sports Sci. Res. 6. pp 36-41.
  2. Armstrong, M. 1994. Trench Warfare: Auxiliary Exercises for the
    Offensive Linemen. Strength and Conditioning. 16(4). pp 7-9
  3. Bauer, T., Thayer, R.E., & Baras G. 1990. Comparison of training
    Modalities for Power Development in the Lower Extremity. Journal of
    Applied Sport Science Research. 4(4). pp 115-121.
  4. Bielik, E., Chu, D., & Costello, F., et al. (1986A). round table: Practical
    considerations for utilizing plyometrics, part 1. National Strength Coaches
    Association Journal, 8(3). pp 14-24.
  5. Bielik, E., Chu, D., & Costello, F., et al. (1986B). round table: Practical
    considerations for utilizing plyometrics, part 2. National Strength Coaches
    Association Journal, 8(4). pp 14-24.
  6. Blakey, J.B. & Southard, D. 1987. The combined Effects of Weight Training
    and Plyometrics on Dynamic Leg Strength and Leg Power. J. of applied
    sport Science Research. 1(1). pp. 14-16.
  7. Blattner, S., & Noble, L. (1979). Relative effects of isokinetic and
    plyometric training on vertical jumping performace. Research Quarterly,
    50(4), 583-588.
  8. Borkowski, J. 1990. Prevention of Pre-Season Muscle Soreness: Plyometric
    Exercise. Abstracted in athletic Training. 25(2). pp 122.
  9. Bosco, C., Komi, P.V., & Ito, A. 1980. Prestretch potentiation of human
    skeletal muscle during ballistic movement. Acta Physiol Scand. 111. pp
  10. Bosco, C., Vitasalo, J.T., Komi, P.V., & Luhtanen, P. 1982. Potentiation
    during stretch-shortening cycle exercise. Acta Physiol Scand . 114. pp
  11. Brown, M.E., Mayhew, J.L., & Boleach, L.W. (1986) The effect of plyometric
    training on the vertical jump of high school boys’ basketball player. Journal
    of Sports Medicine and Physical fitness. 26(1). pp 1-4.
  12. Brzycki, M. 1986. Plyometrics: A Giant step Backwards. Athletic Journal.
    66(9). pp 22-23.
  13. Burr, J. & Young, L. 1989. Plyometrics-is it worth it? Sportsmed-news. pp
  14. Chu, D 1983. Plyometrics: The link between strength and speed. National
    strength Coaches Association Journal, 5(2). pp 20-21.
  15. Chu, D. 1989. Jumping into Plyometrics. National Strength and
    Conditioning Joural. 11(3). pp 81.
  16. Chu, D. 1996. Explosive Power & Strength Complex Training for Maximum
    Results. Champaign IL: Human Kinetics Publishers, Inc.
  17. Clutch, D., Wilton, M., McGown, C., & Bryce, R. 1983. The Effect of Depth
    Jumps and Weight Training On Leg strength and Vertical Jump. Research
    Quarterly For Exercise And Sport. 54(1). pp 5-10.
  18. Horrigan, J. & Shaw, D. 1989. Plyometrics: think before You Leap. Track
    and Field Quarterly Review. 89(4). pp 41-43
  19. Jarver, J. 1981. The Jumps: contemporary theory, Technique and
    Training. Los Altos, Cal: Tafnews Press.
  20. Newton, R. & William, J.K. 1994. Developing Explosive Muscular Power:
    Implications for a Mixed Methods Training Strategy. Strength and
    Conditioning. 16(5). 20-30.
  21. Poole, H., & Maneval, M. 1987. The effects of Two Ten-Week Depth
    Jumping routines On Vertical Jump Performance As It Relates to Leg Power.
    J. Swimming Research. 3(1). pp 11-14.
  22. Pryor, J. 1994. Bound For Success in Football Part 2 - Advanced
    Plyometric Training principles. Strength and Conditioning Coach. 2(3). Pp.
  23. Radcliffe, J. 1994. A Power Perspective. National Strength and
    Conditioning Association. 16(5). pp. 46-47.
  24. Scoles, G. 1978. Depth Jumping! Does it really work? Athletic Journal,
  25. pp 48-75.
  26. Verhoshanski, V. 1967. Are depth jumps useful? Track and Field, 12(9).
    pp 75-78.
  27. Verhoshanski, V. 1966. Perspectives in the improvement of speed-strength
    preparation of jumpers. Review of Soviet Physical Education and Sports.
    4(2). pp 28-29.
  28. Verhoshanski, V., & Tatyan, V. 1983. Speed-strength preparation of futrue
    champions. Soviet Sports Review. 18(4). pp 166-170.
  29. Wathen, D. 1993. Position Statement: Literature Review:
    Explosive/Plyometric Exercises. 3. pp 16-19.
  30. Wikgren, S. 1988. The plyometrics debate Safe and beneficial or
    dangerous and unproven? Coaching Vollyball. 1(5). pp 8-12.
  31. Wilk, K., Voight, M., Keirns, M., Gambetta, V, Andrews, R., & Dillman, C.
  32. Stretch-Shortening Drills for the Upper Extremities: Theory and
    Clinical Application. JOSPT. 17(5). pp. 225-239.
  33. Wilt, F. 1975. Plyometrics-What it is and how it works. Athletic Journal.
    55(5). Pp 76, 89-90.
  34. Zanon, S. 1989. Plyometrics: past and present. New Studies In Athletics.
  35. pp 7-17.[/quote]

WOW!!! LONG!!! But you are right, very informative. I like it. Good find. I also am going to start doing plymetrics. I used to but I only focused on the legs. Thanks for the info!!!

Whitesox101 :wink:

D.M. Now your talking baby or perhaps better said now were reading [whew]! Great piece!

I won’t overload you with the text this time but, if you liked that one, the following links have similar/more info:

This one’s good re: the kinetic chain and is from the USTA (tennis).

I’m a firm believer in the Stretch-Shortening Cycle, but I don’t know if the idea of Plyometrics makes sense. IOW, I’m not convinced that you can enhance this phenomenon through training.